New
U.S. policy needed, not a 'new' Middle East
Sunday, July 30, 2006
By HESHAM MAHMOUD
SPECIAL TO THE HERALD NEWS
|
|
Less than two weeks ago, Hezbollah kidnapped two
Israeli soldiers and demanded a prisoner exchange
with Israel. Note that this was a retaliatory action
for Israel's kidnapping of many Lebanese from
Lebanon and their refusal to return them. Israel's
reaction to bomb Beirut International Airport,
roads, bridges, factories, electricity plants,
hospitals and other civilian infrastructure, seal
Lebanon off by air and sea and kill more than 300
civilians to date is a disproportionate retaliation.
Was Hezbollah action to be condoned? The answer
is obviously "no."
Does this justify the disproportionate force
being used against Lebanon and the Lebanese people?
Logical and thinking people and nations would also
answer "no."
Unfortunately, this has not been the case with
the United States. Rather than calling upon both
parties to immediately cease fire and go back to the
negotiation table, the United States has instead
given Israel the green light to continue its
actions, and in fact is encouraging them. There have
been two reasons given: United Nations Security
Council (UNSC) resolution 1559; the establishment of
what the Bush administration calls the "New Middle
East".
UNSCR 1559, which calls upon all Lebanese militia
to disband, is not logical or practical. Besides,
there are more than 70 U.N Security Council
resolutions in place against Israel that have not
been mentioned. One cannot pick and choose. Either
we believe in the institution or we ignore it.
The U.N.'s top humanitarian official, Jan Egeland
said, ""A disproportionate response by Israel is a
violation of international humanitarian law."
History has shown us that the use of force does
not always work. Israel occupied Lebanon for 18
years and it was unable to disarm Hezbollah. To
expect that Israel will now be able to disarm
Hezbollah over the course of several weeks is
delusional. Hezbollah has the local political
support because it has been on the ground for more
than 20 years talking to the Lebanese people on a
daily basis.
If history is an indication, let's use Fatah.
They only put their arms away when they felt they
had a place at the table. Similarly, the only
practical way to disarm Hezbollah is to bring them
to the negotiation table and allow them to press
their case. We may not like it. But it is what it
is.
Last week the U.S. Senate passed resolution S
Res. 534. The House of Representatives passed HRES
921. Both resolutions support Israel. They both fail
to condemn Israel's disproportionate use of force.
Even so, Sen. John Warner noted the following on the
floor:
"Now we see today that so many nations say the
United States must take a stronger role in trying to
work our way through this conflict, yes, supporting
Israel but at the same time trying to bring about
some resolution to spare the life and limb and
suffering in Palestine, Lebanon, and Israel, to see
that it not spread to other areas.
"I conclude our support for Israel is very
strong, Mr. President, but it cannot be
unconditional."
Warner is right. U.S. policy toward the Middle
East has been a disaster. The unconditional support
of Israel is not in this nation's best interest, and
has not served Israel very well either. In fact,
many would argue that our one-sided policy has
resulted in strengthening the terrorists and it has
given them ammunition to recruit more people. A
serious policy re-evaluation is long overdue.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice described the
violence against Lebanon as part of the "birth pangs
of a "new" Middle East and called upon Israel to
ignore calls for a cease-fire because it would be a
"false promise if it simply returns us to the status
quo."
After a meeting with U.N. members who had just
returned from the Middle East seeking a cease-fire
she said: "whatever we do, we have to be certain
that we are pushing forward to the 'new' Middle
East,' not going back to the old one."
Secretary Rice and the nation she serves would be
better off seeking every possible way and exhausting
every possible means necessary to accomplish an
immediate cease-fire. What we need is a new, honest
and more balanced U.S policy in the Middle East, not
a new Middle East.
Hesham Mahmoud is the media chair of the
America-Arab Anti Discrimination Committee, New
Jersey Chapter ( ADC-NJ). Reach him at
hesham@technochief.com |