ADC-NJ Media Outreach ADC-National ADC-NJ News Upcoming Events Photo Album Arab Americans Contact Us About Us

Board Members

Flying While Muslim

10 steps to take to avoid immigration-related employment discrimination

عشر خطوات يجب إتخاذها لتجنب التمييز في مجال العمل

Look at the Facts not the Faces

اللغة العربية
 
 
Meet & Support
 New Jersey's
Arab American Candidates
 
 

Become An ADC Member

Report an incident to ADC-NJ

 

Ground Air Torture

Take Action For Human Rights

Must Know Links

معلومات مهمة باللغة العربية

Go directly to Guantanamo!

Beware - Jury Duty Scam

A Muslim Woman's Guide To her Civil Rights

 

The Wall Of Hate

Visit The Web site

Watch a Video

 

Letters
E-mail E-mail article Printer Print Subscription Subscribe Newsletters Get e-mail alerts
Free speech isn't a license to insult
Home News Tribune Online 02/19/06
Regarding the "Freedom at stake in cartoon brouhaha" column of Feb. 8 by Michelle Malkin.



In reference to the Turkish ambassador asking the Danish prime minister to apologize for the offending cartoons, she says "in a rare show of European spine, (the prime minister) steadfastly refused to appease the howlers."

Does Malkin have the spine to say the same about the Iranian president who made the outrageous statement regarding the Holocaust and refused to apologize? Or is she just interested in attacking Islam and Muslims?

She calls those offending and tasteless cartoons "freedom of speech."

Just imagine the following cartoons were published in a French newspaper:

 

  • The first cartoon shows Jesus Christ sexually molesting a child while the child is crying and seeking help.

    Reason: The growing number of priests that are sexually molesting kids.

     

  • The second cartoon shows the Virgin Mary handing over a bomb to Jesus Christ and instructing him to go out and blow up the infidels who run the abortion clinics.

    Reason: Christians who blew up abortion clinics in the United States.

    Would she have called this filth "freedom of speech"? Would she have carried a sign saying "Support France"?

    When Chris Ofili of the "Sensation Exhibition" of contemporary British art drew a portrait of the Virgin Mary decorated with elephant dung, which was exhibited at the Brooklyn Museum, Muslims joined hands with Catholics to demonstrate against this insult. And most recently U.S. Muslims called NBC urging the network not to broadcast "The Book of Daniel".

    The violent reaction or threats by some nations as a result of such offensive and uncivil caricatures is not justified. However, trying to justify these cartoons that promote nothing but hate and hide under the umbrella of "freedom of speech," when such disrespectful cartoons are directed toward other people of faith, is mind-puzzling. Could you find a better example to illustrate hypocrisy and immorality than this?

    Hesham Mahmoud

    RUTHERFORD

     

  •