| I am deeply disappointed in
the Iranian government's ingratitude toward the
United States. Sounds weird? Not if you consider the
outcome of the Iraqi election and its implications.
We have helped the Iraqi people get rid of Saddam
Hussein's brutal regime. We have assisted them in
holding their first free democratic election in 50
years. Early results indicated that interim Prime
Minister Iyad Allawi - our puppet - and his
coalition will not finish first. Isn't this a
democracy in action? No one can legitimately claim
that we fixed the election result. Finally the voice
of the Iraqi people has been heard!
But wait a second, who are they voting in?
Initial election results suggest that the Iraqi
people chose the list of the United Iraqi Alliance,
supported by Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, Iraq's
highest Shia cleric. His ticket is headed by Abdul-Aziz
al-Hakim, who leads a group called the Supreme
Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq. Furthermore,
Hakim lived in Iran and is influenced by the Iranian
clerical regime.
If this proves the final result, it does not look
favorabe to America's long-term interests. We are
then left with two choices.
The first is to manipulate the election's result
and make it look as if Allawi's coalition won. This
approach will defeat the whole purpose of freeing
Iraq and restoring democracy. The second choice is
to abide by the will of the Iraqi people who voted.
If this be the case, the Iranian government should
officially thank us for our sacrifices: We will have
helped establish an Iranian-influenced regime in
what used to be a secular republic in Iraq.
Hesham Mahmoud
Rutherford, Feb. 7 |